Chemtrails: The Conspiracy Theory About Lines in the Sky (And What They Really Are)
- Elle

- 5 days ago
- 11 min read

Look up on a clear day when planes are flying overhead. See those white lines trailing behind them, slowly spreading across the sky? What are those?
If you ask a scientist, they'll tell you those are contrails (short for "condensation trails"), formed when hot water vapor from jet engines hits the cold air at high altitude, instantly freezing into ice crystals. It's the same reason you can see your breath on a cold day, just happening several miles up.
But if you ask certain people on the internet, they'll tell you something very different. They'll say those aren't innocent water vapor trails. They're "chemtrails," short for "chemical trails." According to this conspiracy theory, the government (or mysterious elites, or shadowy organizations) is secretly spraying toxic chemicals into the atmosphere from airplanes, poisoning people, controlling minds, manipulating weather, or conducting some other sinister plot.
The chemtrails conspiracy theory has millions of believers worldwide. Some states have even tried to pass laws banning chemtrails. And yet, when scientists actually look at the evidence, they find absolutely nothing to support it. In 2016, researchers surveyed 77 of the world's leading atmospheric scientists and geochemists. Of those 77 experts, 76 said they had never encountered any evidence that chemtrails exist.
So what's going on? Are these trails really evidence of a massive secret spraying program, or is this a case of people misinterpreting a perfectly normal atmospheric phenomenon? Let's dive into one of the internet's most persistent conspiracy theories and separate the science from the speculation.
What Are Contrails Actually?
Before we can understand the conspiracy theory, we need to understand what's really happening when those white lines form behind airplanes.
Contrails (condensation trails) are clouds made of ice crystals. Here's how they form:
Step 1: Jet engines burn fuel at extremely high temperatures. This combustion produces exhaust that contains hot water vapor (among other things).
Step 2: This hot, moist exhaust meets the surrounding air at cruising altitude (usually 30,000 to 40,000 feet up). At that altitude, the air temperature is typically around -40°F or colder.
Step 3: The hot water vapor instantly cools and condenses (turns from gas into liquid), then immediately freezes into tiny ice crystals because it's so cold up there.
Step 4: These millions of ice crystals form a visible white cloud behind the plane. That's a contrail.
It's essentially the same physics as seeing your breath on a cold winter day. When you exhale, the warm, moist air from your lungs hits the cold air outside and condenses into a visible mist. Contrails work exactly the same way, just at much higher altitudes where it's much, much colder.
Contrails are made of the same stuff as natural clouds: water in the form of ice crystals. They're not mysterious. They're not unusual. Scientists have understood them since jets started flying high enough to create them in the 1940s.
Why Do Some Contrails Disappear Quickly While Others Last for Hours?
This is one of the main things that fuels chemtrails conspiracy theories. People notice that sometimes contrails vanish almost immediately, while other times they spread out and linger in the sky for hours. If they're all just water vapor, why would they behave so differently?
The answer is atmospheric conditions, specifically humidity and temperature.
In dry air: If the air at cruising altitude has low humidity, contrails don't last long. The ice crystals quickly sublimate (turn directly from ice back into invisible water vapor) and disappear within seconds or minutes. The trail vanishes almost as soon as it forms.
In humid air: If the air at cruising altitude is close to saturation (meaning it already contains a lot of water vapor), contrails can persist for hours. The ice crystals don't sublimate quickly because the air is already so humid. Instead, they can stick around, spread out, and even grow as more water vapor in the air condenses onto them.
Think of it like this: spill water on a hot, dry sidewalk in summer, and it evaporates in minutes. Spill water on a cool, humid day, and it might stay there for hours. Same water, different conditions, different results.
This is why contrails are unpredictable. The atmospheric conditions change constantly. Two planes flying the same route on the same day might produce very different contrails if they're flying at slightly different altitudes where the humidity is different.
Weather patterns, wind, and temperature all affect how contrails behave. Sometimes they create those grid-like patterns in the sky because multiple planes are flying similar routes at similar altitudes where conditions happen to be right for persistent contrails. Sometimes they spread out until they look like natural cirrus clouds. None of this requires chemicals or a conspiracy. It's just atmospheric physics.
Where Did the Chemtrails Conspiracy Theory Come From?
The chemtrails conspiracy theory didn't exist before the 1990s. So where did it come from?
The origins trace back to 1996, when the U.S. Air Force published a research paper titled "Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025." This was a speculative report about how weather modification might theoretically be used in military operations in the future. It wasn't describing any actual program, just exploring possibilities.
But some people read this report and became convinced that weather modification programs were already underway in secret.
In the late 1990s, posts began appearing on internet forums claiming that the government was spraying mysterious substances from aircraft. Early promoters included individuals like Richard Finke and William Thomas, who wrote articles suggesting that contrails were actually chemical sprays.
The theory really took off in 1999 when it was featured on Coast to Coast AM, a popular late-night radio show hosted by Art Bell that focused on conspiracy theories and paranormal topics. Bell's show had millions of listeners, and the chemtrails theory spread rapidly.
As the theory grew, so did the alleged purposes of the spraying. Different believers proposed different explanations:
Weather modification (controlling rain, storms, or climate)
Population control (making people sick or infertile)
Mind control (spraying chemicals that affect behavior or thinking)
Biological or chemical weapons testing
Solar radiation management (spraying particles to reflect sunlight and combat global warming)
There's no single unified chemtrails theory. Different believers have different ideas about who's behind it and why. But they all share the core belief that those trails in the sky aren't what scientists say they are.
How Scientists Responded
As chemtrails theories spread in the late 1990s, government agencies were flooded with angry calls, letters, and emails from concerned citizens demanding answers. They felt they had to respond.
In 2000, a coalition of federal agencies (the Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Aviation Administration, NASA, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) published a joint fact sheet titled "Aircraft Contrails Factsheet."
The document explained:
How contrails form (basic atmospheric physics)
Why contrails persist sometimes and not others (humidity and temperature)
What's actually in jet engine exhaust (water vapor, carbon dioxide, small amounts of other combustion products)
That there was no evidence of any secret spraying program
The U.S. Air Force also published its own fact sheet calling the chemtrails theory a "hoax" and providing scientific explanations for the trails people were seeing.
But these official statements didn't convince believers. In fact, they often had the opposite effect. To conspiracy theorists, government denials just proved that the government had something to hide. It became a classic unfalsifiable conspiracy theory: any evidence against it is reinterpreted as further proof of the conspiracy.
The 2016 Scientific Survey
In 2016, researchers from the University of California, Irvine, Carnegie Institution for Science, and the nonprofit Near Zero organization decided to conduct the first peer-reviewed scientific study specifically addressing chemtrails.
They surveyed 77 of the world's leading atmospheric chemists and geochemists, experts who study atmospheric composition, air pollution, and atmospheric deposition. These were people who would absolutely notice if there was a large-scale chemical spraying program happening.
The survey asked if they had encountered evidence of a secret large-scale atmospheric spraying program (SLAP).
The results were overwhelming:
76 out of 77 scientists said they had never encountered any evidence of such a program
Only 1 scientist said it was possible, and his reasoning was that he'd detected strontium in soil after seeing contrails in a remote area (scientists pointed out this wasn't good evidence, as strontium occurs naturally in soil)
The scientists emphasized that what conspiracy theorists call "evidence" (photos of contrails, soil samples showing common elements like aluminum or barium) are easily explained by normal atmospheric processes and contaminated sampling methods.
One expert noted: "To analyze metals in environmental samples, glass needs to go through an acid wash to remove any residual metals." Many chemtrails believers were using ordinary Mason jars with metal lids to collect samples, which would contaminate them and produce false results.
The study was published in Environmental Research Letters, giving scientists a peer-reviewed source to point to when addressing chemtrails claims.
Why People Believe Despite the Evidence
If the evidence is so strongly against chemtrails, why do millions of people still believe?
1. You can see them with your own eyes: Contrails are visible. They're right there in the sky. This makes them feel real and immediate in a way that many other phenomena don't. "I can see it, so something must be happening," is a powerful feeling.
2. They do look strange sometimes: When atmospheric conditions create persistent contrails that spread out and last for hours, they genuinely can look unusual, especially if you don't understand the science. Grid patterns from multiple flight paths can look artificial and planned.
3. Distrust of authority: Research shows that belief in conspiracy theories strongly correlates with distrust of government and institutions. If you already don't trust authorities, official denials won't convince you. They might even make you more suspicious.
4. The theory is flexible: As one researcher noted, "The power of the conspiracy is that it can be adjusted to fit any new information." If evidence doesn't support population control, believers shift to weather modification. If that doesn't work, they shift to solar geoengineering. The theory constantly adapts.
5. Confirmation bias: Once people believe in chemtrails, they interpret everything through that lens. A persistent contrail becomes "proof" of spraying. Feeling sick after seeing contrails becomes evidence of poisoning. They notice all the evidence that seems to support their belief while dismissing everything that contradicts it.
6. Social media echo chambers: Online communities of believers reinforce each other's convictions. Algorithms show you content similar to what you already engage with, creating bubbles where chemtrails theories seem normal and widely accepted.
7. There's a grain of truth: Weather modification IS a real thing (cloud seeding has been used since the 1940s). Scientists DO discuss solar geoengineering as a theoretical tool to combat climate change. These real topics get mixed up with the false chemtrails conspiracy, making it harder to separate fact from fiction.
What About Real Weather Modification and Geoengineering?
This is where things get a bit more nuanced. Conspiracy theories often contain small kernels of truth that get wildly exaggerated.
Cloud seeding is real. It's been used since the 1940s, primarily to increase precipitation or reduce hail in specific areas. Small aircraft or ground-based generators disperse substances like silver iodide into clouds, providing nuclei around which ice crystals can form. This can enhance rainfall or snow from existing clouds.
Key differences from chemtrails:
It targets specific clouds, not the entire atmosphere
It happens at low altitudes, not 30,000+ feet where contrails form
It requires permits and is publicly documented
It uses very small amounts of substances
It doesn't create long-lasting white trails in clear skies
Solar geoengineering is a theoretical concept that scientists discuss as a potential response to climate change. The idea would be to release reflective particles into the stratosphere to bounce some sunlight back into space, temporarily cooling the planet.
Key points:
This is currently just research and modeling. No large-scale outdoor testing is happening
If it ever is tested, it would be done transparently with international oversight and public disclosure
It would happen at much higher altitudes than contrails (stratosphere, not troposphere)
The scientific community is extremely cautious about this because of unknown risks
The existence of these real programs and discussions gives chemtrails believers something to point to. But there's a huge gap between "weather modification exists in limited, documented forms" and "commercial jets are secretly spraying poison on the population."
What's Actually in Jet Exhaust?
Let's be clear about what jet engines do emit:
Water vapor: The main component of contrails. Completely harmless.
Carbon dioxide (CO₂): A greenhouse gas contributing to climate change. This is a legitimate environmental concern, but it's not a secret and it's not a chemical spray.
Nitrogen oxides: Produced during high-temperature combustion. These can contribute to smog and acid rain, but they're dispersed over huge areas at high altitude.
Soot and sulfate particles: Tiny particles from incomplete combustion. These can act as nuclei for contrail formation.
Small amounts of other combustion products: Including some trace metals from impurities in fuel.
None of these constitute a "chemtrails" program. They're normal byproducts of burning jet fuel, and they're not hidden. Scientists study aviation emissions extensively because of their environmental impacts.
Are aviation emissions perfect for the environment? No. They contribute to climate change and air pollution. These are legitimate concerns that scientists, regulators, and the aviation industry are working to address through cleaner fuels, more efficient engines, and carbon offset programs.
But that's very different from a secret program to spray harmful chemicals for sinister purposes.
Photos and Videos That "Prove" Chemtrails
Chemtrails believers often share photos and videos online as "proof."
Here's what they're usually actually showing:
Persistent contrails: Just normal contrails in humid conditions. Not evidence of chemical spraying.
Contrail shadows: Sometimes contrails cast shadows on lower cloud layers, creating dark lines. This looks unusual but is just optics.
Fuel dumps: Very rarely, planes need to dump fuel before an emergency landing. Photos of this look dramatic (liquid pouring from wings) but it's not a secret spraying program. It's an emergency procedure.
Water ballast tests: Aircraft manufacturers test planes by filling them with water tanks to simulate different weight configurations. Photos of these tanks have been shared as "proof" of spraying equipment, but they're just for testing.
Fake images: Some photos are digitally manipulated, like cockpit photos showing a "chemtrails on/off" switch that were created as jokes but then shared seriously.
Agricultural spraying: Some photos show actual crop-dusting planes spraying pesticides on farms. This is real chemical spraying, but it's done at low altitudes for farming purposes, not high-altitude atmospheric spraying.
None of these constitute evidence of a chemtrails program.
The Recent Political Angle
In 2025, the chemtrails conspiracy theory took a surprising turn into mainstream politics. Several states introduced legislation to ban "geoengineering" or "chemtrails," even though no such programs exist. Some politicians voiced support for these bills.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., after becoming Secretary of Health in 2025, suggested the Defense Department might be adding chemicals to jet fuel. This gave the conspiracy theory unprecedented mainstream attention and legitimacy in some circles.
Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida expressed support for an anti-geoengineering bill, saying Floridians are "proud of our sunshine."
This political embrace of chemtrails theories concerns scientists because it legitimizes misinformation and could interfere with actual climate research or legitimate discussions about how to address climate change.
The Bottom Line
Here's what's actually true:
Contrails are real: They're condensation trails made of ice crystals that form when hot jet exhaust meets cold air at high altitude.
Contrails vary: They can disappear quickly or last for hours depending on atmospheric humidity and temperature. This variability is normal and well-understood by science.
Chemtrails don't exist: There is no evidence of any secret large-scale atmospheric chemical spraying program. 76 out of 77 of the world's leading atmospheric scientists found no evidence of such a program.
Aviation emissions are a real issue: Planes do emit greenhouse gases and other pollutants that contribute to climate change and air pollution. This is not a secret. Scientists study it extensively. But it's not the same thing as deliberately spraying chemicals.
Weather modification exists in limited forms: Cloud seeding is real but small-scale, low-altitude, and publicly documented. It doesn't involve commercial jets or create contrails.
Geoengineering is theoretical: Scientists discuss solar geoengineering as a possible climate change response, but no large-scale outdoor testing is happening. If it ever happens, it would be transparent with oversight.
Conspiracy theories are persistent: No amount of evidence will convince hardcore believers because they interpret counter-evidence as part of the conspiracy. But for those willing to look at the science, the evidence is clear.
The next time you see white lines in the sky behind an airplane, you're looking at frozen water vapor, not chemicals. You're seeing the visible result of basic atmospheric physics, the same reason you can see your breath on a cold day.
The trails are real. The conspiracy isn't.
Sources
Carnegie Institution for Science. (2016). "Chemtrails" not real, say leading atmospheric science experts. Retrieved from https://carnegiescience.edu/news/%E2%80%9Cchemtrails%E2%80%9D-not-real-say-leading-atmospheric-science-experts
CNN. (2024). Chemtrails are one of the most popular conspiracy theories. Here's what it means. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/us/chemtrails-conspiracy-theory-explained-cec
Harvard Salata Institute. (2025). Understanding and addressing "chemtrails". Retrieved from https://salatainstitute.harvard.edu/understanding-and-addressing-chemtrails/
HowStuffWorks. (2024). What Is the Chemtrails Conspiracy Theory? Retrieved from https://science.howstuffworks.com/transport/flight/modern/what-are-chemtrails.htm
Lab Manager. (2025). Chemtrails vs Contrails: Understanding the Differences and Myths. Retrieved from https://www.labmanager.com/chemtrails-vs-contrails-5182
New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. (2024). Chemtrails and Contrails (ARD-69). Retrieved from https://www.des.nh.gov/sites/g/files/ehbemt341/files/documents/ard-69.pdf
Redalyc. Aircraft clouds: From chemtrail pseudoscience to the science of contrails. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5117/511766757028/html/
Royal Aeronautical Society. 'Chemtrails' debunked. Retrieved from https://www.aerosociety.com/news/chemtrails-debunked/
Shearer, C., West, M., Caldeira, K., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program. Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 084011.
University of California. (2021). Surveyed scientists debunk chemtrails conspiracy theory. Retrieved from https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/surveyed-scientists-debunk-chemtrails-conspiracy-theory
Wikipedia. (2025). Chemtrail conspiracy theory. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory



Comments