The EPA: How One Agency Changed American Health Forever

Imagine a river so polluted that it catches on fire. Not once, but thirteen times. Picture beaches covered in thick, black oil. Think about birds falling from the sky, killed by the very pesticides meant to protect crops. Visualize smog so thick that people can't see across the street.

This wasn't some dystopian movie. This was America in the 1960s.

Today, we have an agency whose job is to make sure our air is breathable, our water is drinkable, and our land isn't poisoned by toxic chemicals. It's called the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA. But this agency didn't always exist. In fact, it was only created about 50 years ago, in response to environmental disasters that shocked the nation into action.

The story of how the EPA came to be is a fascinating tale of pollution, politics, public outcry, and one brave scientist who dared to tell the truth about what we were doing to our planet.

Why the EPA Matters to You (Yes, You)

Before we dive into the history, let's talk about why the EPA matters to your daily life. You might not think about it, but the EPA touches almost everything you do.

Every Morning: When you turn on the faucet to brush your teeth or take a shower, the EPA has set standards ensuring that water doesn't contain dangerous levels of lead, bacteria, or toxic chemicals. Before the EPA, many Americans drank water contaminated with industrial chemicals, sewage, or heavy metals that caused serious health problems.

Your Commute: The air you breathe as you walk to school or ride the bus is dramatically cleaner because the EPA regulates vehicle emissions. Cars today emit about 99% less pollution per mile than cars from the 1960s. Without these regulations, you'd be breathing carbon monoxide, unburned gasoline vapors, and lead particles every time you stepped outside.

At School: The paint on your school's walls doesn't contain lead because the EPA banned lead paint. In the 1960s and 1970s, millions of children suffered brain damage from lead poisoning. Kids who grew up in homes with lead paint had lower IQs, behavior problems, and learning disabilities. The EPA's regulations on lead have prevented countless cases of childhood lead poisoning.

Your Food: When you eat lunch, you're not consuming dangerous levels of pesticides on your fruits and vegetables because the EPA regulates how much pesticide residue can legally remain on food. The agency banned DDT and other chemicals that were building up in the food chain and poisoning both wildlife and humans.

Playing Outside: If you live near a factory, that factory can't legally dump toxic waste into the creek where you might play or fish. It can't emit unlimited pollution that would make the air unsafe to breathe during recess. Companies must follow EPA regulations or face serious penalties.

At the Beach: If you go swimming at a beach, the water has been tested to make sure it's safe. The EPA sets water quality standards and works with states to monitor beaches for bacteria and pollution. Before these protections, people regularly got sick from swimming in contaminated water.

Your Future: The EPA's work on climate change, though controversial, aims to ensure that the planet you inherit isn't so damaged that your generation faces catastrophic consequences. The agency regulates greenhouse gas emissions and works to protect ecosystems that future generations will depend on.

In short, the EPA is the reason you can assume that your air is breathable, your water is drinkable, and your environment won't poison you. These things might seem obvious now, but they definitely weren't obvious 60 years ago.

Before the EPA: When Pollution Was "The Price of Progress"

In the 1950s and early 1960s, environmental protection wasn't really a thing. Sure, some cities had basic sanitation rules, and a few states tried to control the worst pollution. But mostly, Americans accepted dirty air and contaminated water as unavoidable consequences of industry and progress.

Factories dumped whatever they wanted into rivers. Power plants belched smoke into the air without restrictions. Companies sprayed powerful pesticides on crops without understanding (or caring about) what those chemicals did to wildlife, water, or human health. If your neighbor's factory poisoned the creek that ran through your property, that was just tough luck.

The federal government had virtually no role in environmental protection. A patchwork of weak, inconsistent state and local laws meant that pollution standards varied wildly from place to place. A factory could move to a state with looser regulations and pollute freely. Rivers that crossed state lines had no consistent protection because different states had different (or no) rules.

Before 1970, states had sole responsibility for pollution control. But even at the state level, serious environmental efforts were incredibly recent. Oregon created the first statewide air pollution control program in 1952. By 1970, only California had mandated emission standards for car tailpipes. That was it.

Manufacturing was booming. The economy was growing. And if that meant rivers caught fire and city air turned brown, well, that was just the cost of doing business in industrial America.

Silent Spring: The Book That Changed Everything

In 1962, a marine biologist named Rachel Carson published a book called "Silent Spring." It would become one of the most important environmental books ever written.

Carson had spent years researching the effects of pesticides, particularly a chemical called DDT. During World War II, DDT had been hailed as a miracle substance that could kill disease-carrying mosquitoes and protect soldiers from malaria and typhus. After the war, it was widely used in agriculture.

But Carson discovered something disturbing. DDT didn't just kill mosquitoes. It accumulated in the environment and moved up the food chain. When small insects absorbed DDT, they were eaten by birds. The DDT built up in the birds' bodies, causing their eggshells to become so thin that they broke before the chicks could hatch. Bird populations, especially predatory birds like eagles and falcons, were crashing.

And it wasn't just birds. Between 1950 and 1962, the amount of DDT found in human tissue had tripled. Nobody knew what long-term effects this would have on human health.

"Silent Spring" got its haunting title from Carson's vision of a future spring season without birdsong because all the birds had died from pesticide poisoning. She wrote with scientific rigor but also with passion, describing a world where humans were poisoning themselves and the creatures they shared the planet with.

The chemical industry was furious. They attacked Carson viciously, calling her book "gross distortion of actual facts" and questioning her credentials because she was a woman (yes, that kind of sexism was common then). Some critics called her hysterical and emotional, trying to dismiss her careful research as feminine overreaction. But Carson had done her homework. She had built her case on solid science. And the public was listening.

President John F. Kennedy took the controversy seriously enough to order his Science Advisory Committee to review Carson's claims. In 1963, the committee reported back: Carson was right. Her conclusions were generally correct, and action needed to be taken.

"Silent Spring" became a bestseller. It opened millions of Americans' eyes to the idea that humans could damage the environment in ways that would come back to hurt us. It laid the intellectual groundwork for the environmental movement that was about to explode.

The River That Wouldn't Stop Burning

If "Silent Spring" was the spark that ignited environmental consciousness, the Cuyahoga River was the gasoline that made it explode.

The Cuyahoga River flows through Cleveland, Ohio, before emptying into Lake Erie. By the 1960s, it was one of the most polluted rivers in America. Factories lined its banks, dumping chemicals, oil, and industrial waste directly into the water. The river didn't flow so much as ooze. It was so thick with debris and chemicals that it couldn't support any fish life. In some stretches, the water was essentially a toxic sludge.

On June 22, 1969, a spark from a passing train ignited oil and industrial debris floating on the river's surface. Flames shot up, in some places reaching five stories high. It took firefighters only about 20 minutes to put out the blaze, which caused about $50,000 in damage to railroad bridges.

For Cleveland residents, this was nothing new. The Cuyahoga had caught fire at least thirteen times since 1868. The 1952 fire had been much worse, causing over $1 million in damage. To locals, a burning river was just another chapter in Cleveland's industrial story. But this time was different.

A month after the fire, Time magazine ran a story about America's environmental crisis. It mentioned the Cuyahoga fire and featured a dramatic photograph of firefighters battling flames on the river. (Ironically, the photo was actually from the larger 1952 fire, but few people knew that at the time.)

The image of a river on fire shocked the nation. How could things have gotten so bad that water could burn? What did this say about the state of America's environment?

Coming just seven years after "Silent Spring," and in the same year as a massive oil spill off the coast of Santa Barbara, California, the Cuyahoga fire became a symbol of everything that was wrong with how America treated its environment. It galvanized public opinion in a way that statistics and scientific reports never could.

People were fed up. Something had to be done.

Earth Day and the Birth of a Movement

On April 22, 1970, something unprecedented happened. Twenty million Americans (about 10% of the U.S. population at the time) participated in the first Earth Day. It was the largest single-day protest in American history.

Students walked out of classes. Workers left their jobs. People gathered in parks, on beaches, and in city squares to demonstrate their concern for the environment. In New York City, 100,000 people marched down Fifth Avenue. San Francisco closed off miles of streets to cars. Philadelphia held a mock funeral for a gasoline-powered car.

The message was clear: Americans wanted their government to protect the environment. Politicians, who had largely ignored environmental issues, suddenly couldn't avoid them.

Nixon Creates the EPA

President Richard Nixon was not an obvious champion of environmental causes. He's better known for the Watergate scandal that ended his presidency than for any green initiatives. But Nixon was a savvy politician who understood which way the wind was blowing, and in 1970, that wind was decidedly pro-environment.

In his State of the Union address in January 1970, Nixon declared that "the great question of the seventies is, shall we surrender to our surroundings, or shall we make our peace with nature and begin to make reparations for the damage we have done to our air, to our land, and to our water?"

He followed up with a special message to Congress outlining environmental proposals. But there was a problem: environmental responsibilities were scattered across multiple federal agencies and departments. The Department of the Interior handled some pollution issues. The Department of Agriculture dealt with pesticides. The Department of Health, Education and Welfare had jurisdiction over other matters. It was a confusing, inefficient mess.

Nixon recognized that this piecemeal approach wasn't working. Different agencies had different priorities, different standards, and different enforcement mechanisms. There was no coordination, no unified approach. Plus, existing departments might have conflicts of interest. How could the Department of Agriculture, whose job was to help farmers, fairly regulate the pesticides those same farmers used?

On July 9, 1970, Nixon proposed Reorganization Plan No. 3, which would consolidate environmental responsibilities under one new, independent agency: the Environmental Protection Agency.

The proposal moved through Congress quickly. After hearings that summer, both the House and Senate approved it. On December 2, 1970, the EPA officially opened its doors. Two days later, William Ruckelshaus was sworn in as the agency's first Administrator.

The EPA was pieced together from various programs scattered across the federal government. From the Department of Health, Education and Welfare came the National Air Pollution Control Administration and programs dealing with water hygiene, solid waste, and radiation. The Department of the Interior contributed water quality programs. The Department of Agriculture handed over pesticide regulation. The Food and Drug Administration gave up authority over pesticide tolerance levels in food.

The new agency started with 5,800 employees, a budget of $1.4 billion, and 84 facilities spread across 26 states. But most importantly, it had a clear mission: to protect human health and the environment.

What Does the EPA Actually Do?

The EPA's mission sounds simple, but carrying it out is incredibly complex. The agency doesn't make laws. That's Congress's job. Instead, the EPA implements and enforces environmental laws that Congress passes. Think of Congress as making the rules and the EPA as the referee making sure everyone follows them.

Setting Standards

One of the EPA's most important jobs is setting standards for pollution. How much of a particular chemical can legally be in drinking water? What level of air pollution is acceptable? How should hazardous waste be stored and disposed of?

These aren't easy questions. The EPA has to balance protecting health and the environment with economic realities. Set standards too strict, and you might shut down entire industries. Set them too loose, and people get sick or ecosystems are destroyed.

The EPA employs scientists, engineers, economists, lawyers, and policy experts who research pollutants, study health effects, analyze costs and benefits, and draft regulations. Once proposed, regulations go through a public comment period where anyone can weigh in before they become final.

Monitoring and Research

The EPA monitors air and water quality across the country. It tracks pollution levels, tests for contaminants, and studies environmental conditions. This data helps the agency understand where problems exist and whether its regulations are working.

The EPA also conducts research on pollutants and their effects. How does mercury exposure affect child development? What happens when different chemicals mix together? How can we clean up contaminated soil? EPA scientists work to answer these questions.

Enforcement

Setting standards means nothing if nobody follows them. The EPA enforces environmental laws by investigating violations, issuing fines, and taking legal action when necessary.

In the EPA's first few months, Administrator Ruckelshaus made enforcement a priority. He went after major polluters aggressively, including bringing cases against the cities of Cleveland, Detroit, and Atlanta for their water pollution problems. He wanted to establish that the EPA had teeth and was willing to use them.

This aggressive approach set a precedent. Today, the EPA can levy substantial fines against companies that violate environmental laws. In serious cases, it can even bring criminal charges.

Cleaning Up Contaminated Sites

Some pollution is ongoing (a factory releasing chemicals today), but some is legacy pollution (abandoned waste from decades ago). The EPA's Superfund program, established in 1980, cleans up the nation's most contaminated sites.

These cleanups can take years and cost millions of dollars. The EPA identifies the most dangerous sites, figures out who's responsible for the contamination, and either forces them to clean it up or uses federal funds to do it when the responsible parties can't be found or can't afford it.

Education and Assistance

The EPA doesn't just regulate and enforce. It also helps. The agency provides grants to states and communities for environmental projects. It offers technical assistance to businesses trying to reduce pollution. It runs education programs to teach people about environmental issues.

Major EPA Accomplishments: How They Changed People's Lives

In its 50-plus years of existence, the EPA has achieved some remarkable successes. But more importantly, these successes have directly improved millions of lives in concrete, measurable ways:

Cleaner Air Means Healthier Lungs: From 1970 to 1990, emissions of major air pollutants dropped by one-third to one-half. The pollution standards index in major cities improved by half during the 1980s. One early success was getting automobile manufacturers to install catalytic converters in cars, reducing emissions of unburned hydrocarbons by 85%.

What does this mean for real people? In the 1960s, smog alerts in Los Angeles were common. People were told to stay inside because the air was dangerous to breathe. Children couldn't play outside on bad air days. Athletes couldn't train. People with asthma had frequent attacks.

Today, despite having more people, more cars, and more industry, America's air is dramatically cleaner than it was in 1970. You can actually see the skyline in Los Angeles now, something that wasn't true 50 years ago. Asthma rates related to air pollution have dropped. People can exercise outdoors without worrying about poisoning their lungs.

Studies estimate that the Clean Air Act (which the EPA enforces) prevents over 230,000 premature deaths each year. That's 230,000 parents, grandparents, siblings, and children who are alive because they're breathing cleaner air.

Safer Water Means Healthier Communities: The Clean Water Act of 1972 gave the EPA authority to set water quality standards and regulate what could be discharged into waterways. This wasn't just about making rivers prettier. It was about making them safe.

Before the EPA, rivers near industrial areas often smelled terrible and had visible scum floating on the surface. Children who played in these rivers got rashes and infections. People who ate fish from polluted rivers accumulated toxic chemicals in their bodies. Swimming in many rivers and lakes was simply dangerous.

Today, rivers that were once dead from pollution now support fish and recreation. The Cuyahoga hasn't caught fire since 1969, and in 2019, the Ohio EPA announced that fish from the river are now safe to eat. People can swim, fish, and boat in waters that were once toxic. Property values near rivers have increased because people actually want to live near them again.

Banned Dangerous Chemicals, Saved Wildlife (and People): The EPA banned or severely restricted DDT and other harmful pesticides that Rachel Carson wrote about in "Silent Spring."

For people, this meant that the food chain gradually became less contaminated with toxic chemicals. Mothers' breast milk, which in the 1960s often contained alarming levels of DDT and other pesticides, became significantly cleaner. Farmworkers who applied these chemicals were no longer exposed to such dangerous substances.

For wildlife, the results were dramatic. Eagle populations, which had plummeted due to DDT (only about 400 nesting pairs remained in the lower 48 states by the 1960s), have recovered spectacularly. The bald eagle was removed from the endangered species list in 2007. Today, there are over 10,000 nesting pairs. Osprey, peregrine falcons, and brown pelicans also recovered once DDT was banned.

Reduced Lead Exposure, Saved Children's Brains: This might be the EPA's most important public health achievement. The EPA phased out lead in gasoline starting in the 1970s and set strict limits on lead in paint and drinking water.

Lead is a neurotoxin that particularly damages developing brains. Children exposed to lead have permanently lower IQs, increased aggression, attention problems, and learning disabilities. Before EPA regulations, millions of American children had dangerously high lead levels in their blood.

The statistics are staggering: blood lead levels in American children have dropped by over 90% since the 1970s. Researchers estimate that removing lead from gasoline alone prevented 1.2 million cases of childhood lead poisoning and raised the collective IQ of an entire generation of Americans by several points.

Think about that. An entire generation of kids grew up smarter, healthier, and better able to learn because the EPA removed lead from gasoline and paint. That's your parents' generation, or possibly your grandparents', depending on your age. Many of them literally have higher IQs than they would have had without EPA action.

Protected the Ozone Layer, Prevented Cancer: In the 1980s, scientists discovered that chemicals called CFCs (used in refrigerators, air conditioners, and aerosol spray cans) were destroying the Earth's protective ozone layer. The ozone layer blocks harmful ultraviolet radiation from the sun. Without it, rates of skin cancer and cataracts would skyrocket, and ecosystems would be damaged.

The EPA helped phase out CFCs in the United States and worked internationally to achieve a global ban. This effort is working. The ozone hole is slowly healing. Scientists estimate that without this action, by the end of the 21st century, there would be 280 million additional cases of skin cancer, 1.5 million skin cancer deaths, and 45 million cataract cases in the United States alone.

That's millions of people who won't get cancer because the EPA (and international partners) acted to protect the ozone layer.

The EPA's Ongoing Challenges

Despite these successes, the EPA faces continued challenges and controversies.

Climate Change

Perhaps the biggest environmental challenge of our time is climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions. The EPA began regulating greenhouse gases as pollutants in the 2000s, following a 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said failure to regulate them violated the Clean Air Act.

But climate regulation remains contentious. In 2022, the Supreme Court limited the EPA's authority to regulate power plant emissions without additional authorization from Congress. Different presidential administrations have taken vastly different approaches to climate regulation, with some strengthening rules and others rolling them back.

Political Battles

The EPA operates at the intersection of science, economics, and politics, which makes it a frequent target of controversy. Industries complain that regulations are too strict and hurt the economy. Environmental groups argue regulations aren't strict enough and don't adequately protect health or ecosystems.

Different political administrations treat the EPA very differently. Some expand its authority and budget. Others try to reduce both. This back-and-forth creates uncertainty and can undermine the agency's effectiveness.

Emerging Contaminants

New chemicals are constantly being developed, and sometimes we don't understand their environmental or health effects until years after they're widely used. PFAS (often called "forever chemicals") are a current example. These substances have been used in everything from nonstick cookware to firefighting foam, and we're now discovering they persist in the environment and may cause health problems. The EPA is working to regulate them, but it's a slow process.

Environmental Justice

Not all communities bear the burden of pollution equally. Low-income communities and communities of color are disproportionately likely to live near polluting industries, waste facilities, and contaminated sites. The EPA has increasingly focused on environmental justice, trying to ensure that all Americans, regardless of race or income, have clean air, clean water, and healthy environments.

Why the EPA Still Matters to Your Life

Some people argue that the EPA is unnecessary, that environmental protection is too expensive, or that the agency has too much power. These debates will likely continue for as long as the EPA exists.

But it's worth remembering why the EPA was created in the first place and why we still need it today.

Your Health Depends On It: Every regulation the EPA enforces is, at its core, about protecting human health. When the EPA sets limits on mercury emissions from power plants, it's preventing that mercury from getting into fish and eventually into pregnant women, where it can damage developing babies' brains. When it regulates air pollution, it's preventing asthma attacks, heart disease, and premature death. When it monitors drinking water, it's making sure you're not slowly being poisoned by contaminants you can't see, smell, or taste.

Without the EPA, companies would have financial incentives to pollute. Disposing of toxic waste properly costs money. Installing pollution control equipment costs money. It's cheaper (in the short term) to just dump chemicals in rivers or release them into the air. The EPA forces companies to internalize these costs instead of passing them on to society in the form of health problems and environmental damage.

It Prevents the Worst Case Scenarios: Rivers were catching fire. Children were being poisoned by lead. Pesticides were killing wildlife. Air pollution was so bad that people couldn't see across city streets. These weren't hypothetical problems; they were real disasters that were happening.

Industry had proven it wouldn't voluntarily stop polluting. State-by-state regulation had proven inadequate because pollution doesn't respect state borders, and states often competed to have the weakest regulations to attract businesses.

The EPA gave America a way to set consistent, science-based environmental standards and actually enforce them. It created accountability where none had existed before.

Your Generation Has Never Seen the Worst of It: Today's young people have grown up in a world where environmental protection is normal. You've never seen a river on fire. You've never experienced the thick smog that used to blanket American cities every day. You've never seen beaches regularly covered in oil or dead fish. You've never lived in a time when bald eagles were nearly extinct.

That's not because pollution magically disappeared or because companies suddenly became environmentally responsible. It's because we created laws to prevent pollution and an agency to enforce those laws. The EPA made the world you've grown up in possible.

The Battles Aren't Over: While the EPA has won many victories, environmental challenges haven't disappeared. Climate change poses existential threats. New chemicals are constantly being developed, and we don't always know their long-term effects. Plastic pollution is filling our oceans. Many low-income communities still face disproportionate exposure to pollution.

Without the EPA (or something like it), who would address these problems? Individual states acting alone? Voluntary industry initiatives? History suggests neither approach works for large-scale environmental challenges.

The Economic Arguments Cut Both Ways: Critics often say EPA regulations hurt the economy and cost jobs. It's true that environmental regulations cost money to comply with. But pollution also has economic costs that are often ignored.

When children develop asthma from air pollution, their families pay for doctor visits, emergency rooms, and medications.

That's a cost. When workers miss days because they're sick from contaminated water, that's a cost. When fish populations collapse because of pollution, commercial fishermen lose their livelihoods. When people can't enjoy outdoor recreation because of pollution, tourism suffers.

Studies consistently show that the benefits of environmental regulations far exceed their costs. A 2011 EPA study found that the Clean Air Act's benefits outweighed its costs by a factor of 30 to 1. Every dollar spent on air pollution control returned $30 in benefits through prevented illnesses, saved lives, and other gains.

It's About Basic Fairness: Without environmental regulation, people who live near polluting facilities bear all the costs while others reap the benefits. It's not fair that some neighborhoods breathe toxic air so others can have cheaper products. It's not fair that some communities' water is poisoned so industries can save money on waste disposal.

The EPA tries to ensure that all Americans, regardless of where they live, have clean air and clean water. That's not a radical idea; it's a basic principle of fairness and human rights.

The Ongoing Story

The EPA's story is still being written. Environmental challenges continue to evolve. Climate change, plastic pollution, biodiversity loss, and emerging contaminants present new tests for the agency and for society.

What won't change is the basic truth that Rachel Carson articulated in "Silent Spring": humans and the environment are connected. When we poison our air, water, and land, we poison ourselves. Protecting the environment isn't separate from protecting human health; it's the same thing.

The EPA exists because a generation of Americans in the 1960s and 1970s looked at burning rivers and dying birds and said "enough." They demanded that their government do something. And their government responded by creating an agency whose mission was to be, as one official description put it, "the public's advocate for a livable environment."

That mission remains as important today as it was when William Ruckelshaus took his oath of office on December 4, 1970. The details of how we accomplish it will continue to evolve, but the fundamental goal endures: clean air to breathe, clean water to drink, and healthy land to live on.

That's what the EPA is for. That's why it was created. And that's why, 50 years later, it still matters.

Sources

Britannica. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Environmental-Protection-Agency

C&EN Chemical & Engineering News. (2019). Marking 50 years since the Cuyahoga River fire, which sparked US environmental action. Retrieved from https://cen.acs.org/environment/pollution/Marking-50-years-since-Cuyahoga/97/i24

Environment & Society Portal. The US Federal Government Responds. Retrieved from https://www.environmentandsociety.org/exhibitions/rachel-carsons-silent-spring/us-federal-government-responds

History.com. (2025). Environmental Protection Agency opens. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/december-2/environmental-protection-agency-opens

History.com. (2025). The Shocking River Fire That Fueled the Creation of the EPA. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/articles/epa-earth-day-cleveland-cuyahoga-river-fire-clean-water-act

Lead the Change, Bard College. (2025). A Look at EPA History: Environmental Wins and Remaining Woes. Retrieved from https://leadthechange.bard.edu/blog/a-look-at-epa-history-environmental-wins-and-remaining-woes

Ohio History Connection. (2024). Silent Springs and Burning Rivers. Retrieved from https://www.ohiohistory.org/silent-springs-and-burning-rivers/

Science History Institute. (2023). The Myth of the Cuyahoga River Fire. Retrieved from https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/distillations-pod/the-myth-of-the-cuyahoga-river-fire/

TIME. (2017). Environmental Protection Agency: Why the EPA Was Created. Retrieved from https://time.com/4696104/environmental-protection-agency-1970-history/

U.S. Earth Magazine. Benchmarks: June 22, 1969: The Cuyahoga burns. Retrieved from https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/benchmarks-june-22-1969-cuyahoga-burns/

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Birth of EPA. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/aboutepa/birth-epa.html

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA History. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/history

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Origins of EPA. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/history/origins-epa

U.S. Federal Register. Agencies: Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies/environmental-protection-agency

Wikipedia. (2025). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency